金砖五国

Kheri killing: Trial court has found murders were premeditated, victims' lawyer tells SC_我的网站

A |     New Delhi, Oct 17 (UNI) Senior lawyer, Dushyant Dave, appearing for the victims in the Lakhimpur Kheri case, told the Supreme Court on Monday there are clear indications that the act was "premeditated", and pleaded that the main accused, Union Minister Ajay Mishra's son Ashish Mishra should not be granted bail in the case.

"There are clear indications that the act was premeditated. The Trial courts in the State of Uttar Pradesh had found it was premeditated. Five people were killed. He be permitted to bring the trial court judgement on record," Dave told the Supreme Court's two-judge bench, headed by Justice B R Gavai.

Mukul Rohatgi, former Attorney General (AG) and senior criminal lawyer appearing for Ashish Mishra, opposed the contentions of Dave and said it was not premeditated. "The killing was not at at all premeditated. It is incorrect," Rohatgi argued before the Supreme Court.

The State of Uttar Pradesh Monday sought more time to file its response in the case, for which, the Supreme Court granted two weeks time and posted the matter for further hearing to November 7.

The prime accused, Ashish Mishra, had moved the Supreme Court in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case and sought bail in it.

The apex court had already issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government and sought its reply after hearing the bail plea filed by Ashish Mishra, accused in Lakhimpur Kheri farmers' mowing down by vehicle incident.

Mishra was denied bail by the Allahabad high court on July 26, after which he knocked the doors of the Supreme Court in August last week, seeking relief and bail.

There is no possibility of hampering and tempering with the prosecution witnesses. 98 witnesses and their family members have been provided gunners including the barricading of police at their residence under the CCTV camera," Mishra, in his appeal filed before the Supreme Court said.

Mishra was arrested on October last year, and the charge sheet filed in the case claimed the killing to be "pre planned".

The prosecution said Mishra came in a SUV along with a convoy of three-four cars on October 3, last year, and allegedly mowed down protesting farmers against the now repealed farm laws, gathered to protest against it.

UNI XC SY。    当今全球地缘政治的复杂背景下，军事力量的对比不仅关乎一国的安全，也直接影响到世界各国的战略布局。不久前，美国海军经历了第二次航母危机。尽管“华盛顿”号的抵达暂时缓解了局势，但西方媒体的关注已经迅速转向了中国新航母，令外界不禁好奇：这艘传说中的航母究竟会带来怎样的变化？    根据多方资料分析，中国的新一代航母在基础尺寸上明显接近甚至超越了美国的“福特”号，预计排水量将稳稳跨过10万吨大关，甚至有可能达到11万吨，俨然成为全球最大航母。    此外，其搭载的电磁弹射器和五代隐身舰载机歼-35的组合，使得其战斗力在理论上得到了极大增强。因此，许多专家认为，这艘航母未来有可能成为全球最强的航母，这引发了国际社会对中美海军实力对比的新一轮讨论。        而这一切，正是在美国军工体系遭遇制造业衰落的背景下发生的。在“福特”号航母的建设过程中，美国海军显然陷入了技术瓶颈与混乱管理之中。    虽然“福特”号承袭了不少成熟设计，但诸如电磁弹射器出现频繁故障、F-35C舰载机的设计延误等问题，严重影响了航母的战斗力与服役时间。对于耗资133亿美元却“无能”的航母，美方舆论早已对此表示不满。    面对这种境况，美国海军仍在努力推动下一艘航母——“肯尼迪”号的进程，计划在2027年完成服役。然而，值得注意的是，由于港口建设进度延迟，“肯尼迪”号的实际部署或将推迟至2030年以后。而竞逐这一过程的中国新航母，依靠福建舰的电磁弹射器实践，对于推进海试进度可谓是大有裨益。这意味着，若一切顺利，新航母有望在2029年上半年正式入役。        从战略层面来看，中国海军的快速发展并非偶然。无人不知，现代战争的胜负往往取决于航空母舰的制空权和海洋控制能力。为此，中国在造船工业方面也未雨绸缪，目前拥有两个大型航母造船厂，目标是在今后十年内实现每五年下水两艘、十年入役四艘的宏伟规划。    另一方面，美国的航母现状却显得愈发不堪。

B | 特朗普政府在2019年针对“福特”级的进展做出了一些调整，其中包括取消“米勒”号的命名，并选择使用“特朗普”号作为新的舰名，反而引发了业界对于美国海军决策与一致性的质疑。这种种迹象说明，美国海军在航母建设上的紧迫感以及整体战略面临着越来越多的挑战。    在这个关键时刻，关于中美两国航母实力对比的讨论尤为重要。一方面，随着中国新航母的即将入役，外界普遍认为，其排水量的提升以及前沿科技的应用，将使其具备超越传统“福特”号航母的潜力；另一方面，虽然美国海军在全球依然保持一定的优势，但随着自身技术和建造能力的瓶颈顽固化，其未来的航母计划似乎变得愈发艰难。        当然，航母战斗力的提升并非仅仅依赖于排水量和科技，更涉及到相关体系的协调与智慧。

C | 美国虽然在海军的军事技术上有着深厚的积累，但现阶段的“福特”号经历重重磨难，突显了战略思维与执行力之间的鸿沟。而中国的新航母如能在时间节点上优于对手，以适应未来战场的复杂性，加之充分验证的电磁弹射技术，那么在太平洋地区的军事格局上，就将掀起新的波澜。    在未来的国际局势中，各国间的博弈将不会因一艘舰艇的服役而完全改变，然而它所折射出的国力、技术、战略思维等深层因素，必将持续影响着全球的安全形势和力量对比。

D | 因此，如何应对这一亟待解决的困境，提升综合国力和战略思维，将是摆在每一个国家面前的重要课题。

E |     总之，在这场海洋力量的时代角逐中，无论是中国的新航母还是美国的现有舰队，都在为未来的安全环境描绘着可能的发展轨迹。返回，查看更多。

Current article:http://6o4zj5.minpinpengcemiuanjiuxuan.pics/1itud/20260826/52642.html

Published on:20:48:30